Methodology — Revision 04-B, 2024
A record of how the Imadero editorial team selects, reviews and archives formulation entries. Methodology version 04-B. Updated March 2024.
01 — Review Process
Formulations enter the review pipeline through three channels: independent research by the editorial team, reader submissions, or identification via published nutritional literature. All three channels are assessed equally — manufacturer-initiated contact is declined.
The initial assessment determines whether the formulation has sufficient documentation available to proceed to the sourcing stage. Formulations with no accessible batch documentation are archived without further review.
Each active ingredient in the formulation is traced to its supplier of record. The team reviews the chain-of-custody documentation available for each ingredient, confirming origin, extraction method (where applicable), and the food-grade processing status of the supplier facility.
Sourcing assessments are recorded in the Imadero documentation archive. Where supplier documentation is incomplete or unavailable, the catalogue entry notes the gap explicitly rather than omitting it.
Reviewed
Origin Region
Reviewed
Extraction Method
Reviewed
Processing Standards
The active compound profile of each formulation is compared against current published nutritional reference values. The team does not conduct its own laboratory analysis — formulation assessment is based on certificates of analysis issued by independent third-party verification bodies retained by the manufacturer or distributor.
Where elemental or molecular concentration data is available (e.g., ICP-OES or HPLC analysis), it is recorded against the declared value on the product label to assess labelling accuracy.
Batch-specific verification is the final gate in the review process. The editorial team requires a current certificate of analysis — issued no more than 18 months prior to catalogue publication — for the specific batch referenced in the entry.
Batch codes and certification dates are recorded in the archive. Entries are marked for re-verification at each quarterly review cycle.
| Verification Type | Accepted Source | Max Age |
|---|---|---|
| Certificate of Analysis | Independent third-party body | 18 months |
| Elemental Analysis (ICP-OES) | Accredited analytical laboratory | 12 months |
| HPLC Chromatography Report | Accredited analytical laboratory | 12 months |
| Microbiological Screen | Independent third-party body | 18 months |
Following completion of stages 01-04, the editorial team prepares the catalogue entry. The write-up follows a fixed structure: formulation identifier, key ingredients, sourcing region, active compound concentration (where available), and nutrient-role summary drawn from published research.
Completed entries are reviewed by a second editorial team member before publication. The archived version is retained with all supporting documentation for a minimum of five years.
02 — Supplier Standards
Active ingredients are sourced from documented suppliers, with each batch accompanied by a certificate of composition. Sourcing prioritises suppliers whose facilities maintain food-grade processing standards consistent with international labelling accuracy requirements.
The team maintains a preferred supplier register — a rolling record of ingredient sources that have provided full documentation across at least three consecutive batch reviews. Preferred-supplier status does not imply commercial endorsement; it indicates a documented track record of compositional accuracy.
Suppliers are assessed against four criteria: chain-of-custody documentation completeness, food-grade processing status, labelling accuracy record (based on certificate-of-analysis deviation history), and responsiveness to documentation requests.
Full traceability from cultivation or extraction site to finished formulation. Country of origin and facility identifier recorded.
Supplier facilities operate under documented food-grade processing standards. Processing environment documentation reviewed at onboarding and re-assessed annually.
Historical deviation between declared active compound concentration and certificate-of-analysis result maintained for each supplier. Acceptable deviation: ±10% of declared value.
Suppliers are assessed on turnaround time for documentation requests. Non-responsive suppliers are flagged in the archive and excluded from the preferred-supplier register.
03 — Research Standards
Nutrient-role descriptions in catalogue entries reference applicable nutrient reference values from published regulatory guidance — specifically the EFSA nutrient reference values for the European population and comparable Asian nutrition reference standards where available for Southeast Asian populations.
Ingredient profiles in Imadero supplements are selected based on published nutritional research and undergo independent batch verification for quality and labelling accuracy. Anecdotal sources, brand-published white papers and influencer content are excluded from the reference framework.
The catalogue does not extrapolate nutrient roles beyond what current published evidence supports. Where research is emerging or mixed, entries record this explicitly. Catalogue copy does not employ performance language in descriptions of nutrient function.
Editorial Disclosure
Imadero is an independent wellness resource focused on everyday nutrition and active lifestyle practices for men. The content is not affiliated with any governmental or institutional body.
We recommend speaking with a qualified wellness or nutrition professional before introducing any supplement to your daily routine, particularly if you have specific dietary requirements.
04 — Verification Infrastructure
Documentation archive — Imadero editorial office, Kuala Lumpur.
All batch documentation collected during the review process is held in a structured archive. Physical certificates of analysis are filed by formulation identifier and batch code. Digital copies are maintained in a redundant document management system.
The archive is cross-referenced with the catalogue. Each published entry links to a documentation reference — a batch code, certification date, and issuing body — allowing the editorial team to trace any entry back to its source documentation.
Minimum Archive Retention
Re-Verification Cycle
05 — Methodology Questions
No. Imadero is an editorial resource, not an analytical laboratory. Formulation assessments are based on certificates of analysis issued by independent third-party verification bodies. The editorial team reviews and archives this documentation; it does not generate its own analytical reports.
Nutrient-role descriptions are drawn from published regulatory guidance on nutrient reference values — principally EFSA opinions and comparable published standards for Southeast Asian populations. Descriptions are written conservatively, reflecting only what current published evidence supports, and are reviewed against updates to reference values at each quarterly editorial cycle.
Imadero does not accept manufacturer submissions, paid placements or sponsored catalogue entries. All formulations reviewed are identified independently by the editorial team. Documentation requests may be made to manufacturers as part of the review process, but the editorial decision to include or exclude a formulation remains with the team.
The methodology is reviewed annually by the full editorial team and updated when changes in published nutritional guidance, verification standards or supplier assessment criteria warrant revision. Each revision is versioned and the methodology page updated with the current revision reference. Archived versions of previous methodology documents are retained.